Written by Mike Wilson
From the British Resistance site
I grieve from a distance for the death
of my native country,England.
The country that was at the heart of Western Europe during two thousand years of slow secure growth, resulting in a free and democratic society that was the envy of most of Europe.
The country that was at the heart of Western Europe during two thousand years of slow secure growth, resulting in a free and democratic society that was the envy of most of Europe.
The country that gave rise to democratic
government that has been copied by every other civilized nation. The
country that championed free speech and the freedom of the individual.
The country that instilled the love of family and family values. The
country that tried to educate and foster knowledge in third world
bastions of indifference where speed breeding and poverty were and still
are the norm. The country where the love of one’s fellow man has led
to its own inescapable ruin.
The German philosopher Nietzsche
had said in so many words that the Christian ethic of allowing the meek
to inherit the earth would in the end undermine the very fabric of
society and ultimately bring about its downfall.
We see now that he was so right yet at the time people were unable to comprehend his argument. Another person who was vilified for professing a similar argument albeit on slightly different lines was Enoch Powell and how right was he?
How have we come to this point in time
where every freedom we used to take for granted is now questioned and
overturned by an authority that is set to deny us that very freedom for
which our fathers and forefathers fought and laid down their lives.
There are several reasons, most of them
are interlinked in some way and all have been exposed over time, yet
none of them have been rallied against, fought against or argued against
but all have simply been meekly accepted by the population with
absolutely stunning apathy and everyone has been led meekly to the
slaughter by the men in white coats.
What are these reasons? Well let’s list some of them:-
1. New World Order.
2. Political Correctness.
3. European Union.
These are the three major areas although there are some sub groups that promote too much hostility to comment on at this point.
So let’s look at the New World Order.
This name seems to have started as a post Cold-War scenario in a speech given by George H W Bush to congress in 1990.
He was pushing for an international government to be run by the United Nations. The UN originated out of work done by the Council on Foreign Relations
of which Bush was a member. The vision of the UN founders is clearly
globalist. It advocates a shift in sovereignty from the state to the
international level there-by doing away with nation states. It seeks to
have increased authority, security, and judicial powers of an
international body with enhanced social and economic interdependence and
some significant level of military disarmament of the nation states.
You will all be aware of just how far this has come since this UN plan was put together by the Council on Foreign Relations.
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." - James Warburg (Rothschild Banking Agent 1950)
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." - David Rockefeller
"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." - Carroll Quigley, Professor of History Georgetown University, in his book "Tragedy and Hope".
"The interests behind the Bush administration, such as the CFR, the Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberg Group have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years." - Dr. Johannes Koeppl (Former official of the German Ministry for Defence and advisor to NATO)
"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax exempt foundation (i.e. Rockefeller), and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labour, military, education, and mass communication media, that it should be familiar to every person concerned with good government and with preserving and defending our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation's right-to-know machinery, the news media; usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the US from a sovereign Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship." - Congressman John R. Rarick
The above quotes show that a New World Order is a reality and that the world has changed forever.
More quotes:
It appears that a vampire-like clique
directs the world. This secretive cabal is represented by our dominant
political, economic and cultural institutions. Western society has been
subverted and western culture is bankrupt. Democracy is a form of
social control and the mass media/ education are systems for
indoctrination.
Essentially the problem boils down to
whether we believe man was made in God's image and has an obligation to
lift himself to a higher level of truth, beauty and justice. Naturally
monopolists have no use for this and want to define reality to suit
their own interests. They have taught us that God is dead and man is
just a fancy animal without a divine soul. Culture today tends to deny
standards, ideals and goals of any kind. Instead, we are fed an endless
diet of trivia and degradation.
So now you know why things are as they
are on the world scene and why our situation in England has changed so
irrevocably over the last 20 years.
But what about closer to home, what
about so called racial intolerance, freedom of speech, overzealous
policing, black gangs, raping of white women, mass immigration, free
housing for ethnics at the expense of the indigenous population and so
on?
So now we need to look at political correctness.
This was originally viewed as something
of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it
as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great
disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of
people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It
is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.
If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism.
It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an
effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace
movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of
Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very
obvious.
First of all, both are totalitarian
ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is
revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at
this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or
faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender
feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or
Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC
revolves around, face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding –
and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political
Correctness intends for the nation as a whole. The fact of the matter is
that Political Correctness has a history, a history that is much longer
than many people are aware of outside a small group of academics who
have studied this. And the history goes back, as I said, to World War I, as do so many of the pathologies that are today bringing our society, and indeed our culture, down.
In 1923 in Germany, a think-tank is
established that takes on the role of translating Marxism from economic
into cultural terms, that creates Political Correctness as we know it
today, and essentially it has created the basis for it by the end of the
1930s.
Britain today is in the throes of the
greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an
ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by
the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving
jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Parliament is now moving
to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of
it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness
on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in
Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And
we don’t recognise it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh
it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s
growing and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy,
everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture.
The Frankfurt school recommended (amongst other things):
1. the creation of racism offences
2. continual change to create confusion
3. the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. the undermining of schools and teachers' authority
5. huge immigration to destroy national identity
6. the promotion of excessive drinking
7. emptying the churches
8. an unreliable legal system with bias against the victim of crime
9. dependency on the state or state benefits
10. control and dumbing down of media
11. encouraging the breakdown of the family
2. continual change to create confusion
3. the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. the undermining of schools and teachers' authority
5. huge immigration to destroy national identity
6. the promotion of excessive drinking
7. emptying the churches
8. an unreliable legal system with bias against the victim of crime
9. dependency on the state or state benefits
10. control and dumbing down of media
11. encouraging the breakdown of the family
Sound all too familiar? Yes - Great Britain 1997 onwards......
(The above excerpts taken from a speech by Bill Lind in February 2000.)
Finally what has the European Union got to do with any of this?
Well, if you think about it the union is simply an extension of the New World order taking its lead from the controllers who manage world affairs. They set up Europe for total control by the commission in Brussels and the commission themselves are controlled in the process.
The European Union is not about
cooperation for protecting the best interests of Europeans; it is about
turning the entire continent into a Multicultural theme park
while the natives get culturally deconstructed and demographically
crushed. The EU is a large-scale social experiment conducted on
hundreds of millions of people. It is not about economics of scale, it
is about stupidity of scale. The EU system corrupts virtually everybody
who comes close to it. It cannot be reformed, it can only be
dismantled.
Unfortunately, for our late Great Britain the time has gone when such a dismantling could have occurred.
Now we of the older generation can only
look on in dismay as the indoctrination of the younger generation
spreads its insidious web throughout the whole of society. The
government will only be able to rest easily once we have all gone and
the people who take our place will have no knowledge of our glorious
past only their own history formed of pre-digested facts fed to them by
their masters.
So I can still grieve for what was and
what has been lost, but the grief is only mine – and once I am gone and
those of my generation who will remember the great nation that we used
to be?
